Re: [Jack-Devel] Network Audio Transmission - Quality

PrevNext  Index
DateMon, 24 Jun 2013 15:23:47 +0100
From Matthew Robbetts <[hidden] at gmail dot com>
CcJACK <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToAdrian Knoth Re: [Jack-Devel] Network Audio Transmission - Quality
Follow-Up[hidden] at trellis dot ch Re: [Jack-Devel] Network Audio Transmission - Quality
Ah, good idea. I know one person who developed tinnitus and said he became
more sensitive to such things after. I've no idea if tinnitus specifically
is a plausible cause, but I like the explanation overall!


On 24 June 2013 15:05, Adrian Knoth <[hidden]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 02:06:42PM +0100, Matthew Robbetts wrote:
>
>
> > >> If I couldn't hear a difference between an original .wav file and a
> > >> 256kb/s mp3 I'd repair my monitoring equipment.
> > > .. and join the small though not empty set of people who are capable of
> > > doing this. double blind testing of 256kbps mp3s and uncompressed
> digital
> > > audio generally reveal a failure to be able to differentiate, despite
> what
> > > is said so often in mainstream and technical publications.
> > Is the set really not empty, with a good encoder? I am surprised,
> frankly.
>
> Generally speaking, if you're hearing impaired, your ear no longer
> functions as anticipated by the psychoacoustic model. That said, the
> encoder will produce something which sounds different to what you're
> used to, thus making such files distinguishable.
>
>
> So it's certainly the exception, not the rule.
>
> --
> mail: [hidden]       http://adi.thur.de      PGP/GPG: key via keyserver
>
> 
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> [hidden]
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>
PrevNext  Index

1372083835.15632_0.ltw:2,a <CAB5efjRyuA6g_HsmsyUCCG6rqq2YMcbSOa0AM9vG1am0yRQJcQ at mail dot gmail dot com>