Re: [Jack-Devel] Network Audio Transmission - Quality

PrevNext  Index
DateMon, 24 Jun 2013 16:05:00 +0200
From Adrian Knoth <[hidden] at drcomp dot erfurt dot thur dot de>
To[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToMatthew Robbetts Re: [Jack-Devel] Network Audio Transmission - Quality
Follow-UpMatthew Robbetts Re: [Jack-Devel] Network Audio Transmission - Quality
Follow-UpJohn Rigg Re: [Jack-Devel] Network Audio Transmission - Quality
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 02:06:42PM +0100, Matthew Robbetts wrote:


> >> If I couldn't hear a difference between an original .wav file and a
> >> 256kb/s mp3 I'd repair my monitoring equipment.
> > .. and join the small though not empty set of people who are capable of
> > doing this. double blind testing of 256kbps mp3s and uncompressed digital
> > audio generally reveal a failure to be able to differentiate, despite what
> > is said so often in mainstream and technical publications.
> Is the set really not empty, with a good encoder? I am surprised, frankly.

Generally speaking, if you're hearing impaired, your ear no longer
functions as anticipated by the psychoacoustic model. That said, the
encoder will produce something which sounds different to what you're
used to, thus making such files distinguishable.


So it's certainly the exception, not the rule.

-- 
mail: [hidden]  	http://adi.thur.de	PGP/GPG: key via keyserver
PrevNext  Index

1372082707.13702_0.ltw:2,a <20130624140459.GK5601 at ltw dot loris dot tv>