Re: [Jack-Devel] [jack2] Add JackPortIsCV flag (#34)
my initial response (after just checking email for the first time in a few
days, here in the UK) is that this seems like precisely the sort of thing
that the meta-data proposal is designed for.
i'll post something else if i change my mind ...
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:46 AM, St鰨ane Letz <[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Le 11 mai 2013 ࠰2:05, falkTX <[hidden]> a 飲it :
>
> > This pull request adds a new JACK port flag, JackPortIsCV.
> >
> > This is useful for applications that use JACK audio ports as CV.
> > As it's merely a hint, it won't hurt current JACK usage.
> > Patch-bays will welcome this change and may choose to represent these
> ports in a special way.
> >
> > A new macro was also added, JACK_HAS_PORT_IS_CV_FLAG.
> > This allows new applications to safely check for this new flag existence.
> >
> > You can merge this Pull Request by running
> >
> > git pull https://github.com/falkTX/jack2 master
> > Or view, comment on, or merge it at:
> >
> > https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2/pull/34
> >
> > Commit Summary
> >
> > Add JackPortIsCV flag
> > Add JACK_HAS_PORT_IS_CV_FLAG macro
> > File Changes
> >
> > M common/jack/types.h (11)
> > Patch Links:
> >
> > https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2/pull/34.patch
> > https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2/pull/34.diff
>
> Then I would suggest:
>
> - make the name more explicit : JackPortIsCV ==> JackPortIsControlVoltage
>
> - seems that JackPortIsControlVoltage value should be 0x20
>
> What do other JACK core developers think about this proposal?
>
> Thanks.
>
> St鰨ane
>
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> [hidden]
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>
1368385858.8300_0.ltw:2, <CAFa_cKkLrCsjbOcj2itjabq3PurwKOpRzq=Laz7N78yXLwedeQ at mail dot gmail dot com>