Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack for Windows

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 23 Jan 2013 13:13:32 +0100
From Nouvelle Collection <[hidden] at gmail dot com>
ToStéphane Letz <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
CcJACK List <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToStéphane Letz Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack for Windows
Follow-UpStéphane Letz Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack for Windows
Follow-UpJohn Emmas Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack for Windows
Hi everybody,

Who is willing to code with me, a "virtual soundcard driver" (that will add
a playback device in the list of Control Panel's playback devices), whose
job is just to route the audio to JACK ?

We really need this for JACK for Windows : to be able to play all softwares
into JACK.

Who wants to do it together ? ;)

See you! jebb

2013/1/23 Stéphane Letz <[hidden]>

>
> Le 22 janv. 2013 à 22:29, Paul Davis a écrit :
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:21 PM, John Emmas <[hidden]>
> wrote:
> > On 22 Jan 2013, at 14:38, Paul Davis wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > sad that JACK still uses portaudio as the backend, too - but nobody
> has stepped up to improve that situation either
> > >
> >
> > Just out of interest, what's wrong with Portaudio?
> >
> > nothing in particular, its just a silly to base an audio API on another
> audio API with quite similar properties. if we used portaudio on linux +
> osx, then the argument might be stronger, but on those platforms we have
> dedicated code designed to interact with the native audio API on each. it
> is only on windows where we fall back on portaudio, for no reason other
> than lack of human resources to do dedicated backends for WDM, DirectSound,
> etc.
>
> Well not sure PortAudio is so bad.. compared to a more dedicated version,
> which would possibly make sense on ASIO.
>
> Stéphane
>
> 
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> [hidden]
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>
PrevNext  Index

1358943239.18034_0.ltw:2,a <CA+BV=GX93Fv-qGYroq0LoGegGsDAMmZELKzPwQj7S4sUGYakMQ at mail dot gmail dot com>