Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack for Windows

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 23 Jan 2013 11:14:20 +0100
From Stéphane Letz <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
ToPaul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
CcJACK List <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToPaul Davis Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack for Windows
Follow-UpNouvelle Collection Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack for Windows
Le 22 janv. 2013 à 22:29, Paul Davis a écrit :

> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:21 PM, John Emmas <[hidden]> wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2013, at 14:38, Paul Davis wrote:
> 
> >
> > sad that JACK still uses portaudio as the backend, too - but nobody has stepped up to improve that situation either
> >
> 
> Just out of interest, what's wrong with Portaudio?
> 
> nothing in particular, its just a silly to base an audio API on another audio API with quite similar properties. if we used portaudio on linux + osx, then the argument might be stronger, but on those platforms we have dedicated code designed to interact with the native audio API on each. it is only on windows where we fall back on portaudio, for no reason other than lack of human resources to do dedicated backends for WDM, DirectSound, etc.

Well not sure PortAudio is so bad.. compared to a more dedicated version, which would possibly make sense on ASIO.

Stéphane
PrevNext  Index

1358936076.6210_0.ltw:2,Sa <7A90D5BE-471F-488D-985B-15B2BE185382 at grame dot fr>