| Prev | Next Index |
| Date | Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:14:16 +0200 |
| From | Nedko Arnaudov <[hidden] at arnaudov dot name> |
| To | [hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org |
| In-Reply-To | Stéphane Letz Re: [Jack-Devel] JACK 1.9.10 to test (for 64/32 bits compatibility) |
Stéphane Letz <[hidden]> writes: > Only opaque pointers: yes, would be the correct way.... > > For jack3 ?? Who wants to break jack api compatibility? If it gets broken, it will be good to be coordinated. jack1 and jack2 at least. But we have two or three "alternative" jack implementations on the horizon. -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: 5D1B58ED>
| Prev | Next Index |
1357748071.17744_0.ltw:2, <877gnmnxk7.fsf at arnaudov dot name>