Re: [Jack-Devel] JACK 1.9.10 to test (for 64/32 bits compatibility)
Adrian Knoth <[hidden]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:58:22PM +0200, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
>
>> >>> I stay on my latest view: do not try to solve a problem (possible
>> >>> 64/32 Bits issue on ARM) that is still not there.
>> But the problem with ABI mismatches between jack1 and jack2 is not
>> solved.
>
> Which one exactly? jack_latency_range_t? Not sure if
>
> For jack_position_t, jackd1 does use packed structs:
>
> https://github.com/jackaudio/headers/blob/master/transport.h#L40
jack2 does. This is why i'm talking about jack1/jack2 mismatches.
https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2/blob/master/common/jack/types.h#L262
https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2/blob/master/common/jack/types.h#L553
--
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: 5D1B58ED>
1357747792.17301_0.ltw:2, <87bocynxs4.fsf at arnaudov dot name>