Re: [Jack-Devel] Ethernet-based audio interface using (net)jack idea

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 17 Aug 2011 12:41:00 +0200
From Jeroen Van den Keybus <[hidden] at gmail dot com>
ToFons Adriaensen <[hidden] at linuxaudio dot org>
Ccjack-devel <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToFons Adriaensen Re: [Jack-Devel] Ethernet-based audio interface using (net)jack idea
Follow-UpJohn Rigg Re: [Jack-Devel] Ethernet-based audio interface using (net)jack idea
Follow-UpFons Adriaensen Re: [Jack-Devel] Ethernet-based audio interface using (net)jack idea
 Fons,

 The clock generated by the DPLL is not intended as the sampling clock:


> > and feeding that signal back
> > (externally - FPGA PLL inputs are always dedicated inputs) into one of
> the
> > FPGA PLLs to generate MCLK.
>

In fact, my idea was to use one of the FPGA analog PLLs with slow loop
setting to lock onto the
jittery (but not as jittery as the sync packets) DPLL output. So I will be
using the FPGA analog PLL as a VCO.

The main question remains whether or not the PLL will be able to properly
lock on a DPLL output signal that is - indeed - fairly jittery. That
probably calls for an experiment.



> I seriously doubt if you can get a sampling clock with the required
> low jitter using the FPGA's digital PLLs. The next thing to look at
> would be an external VCXO module to generate the master clock, with
> the loop closed by digital filtering in the FPGA followed by an
> analog lowpass driving the VCXO. Lock range for VCXOs is small but
> it should be enough to cover typical sound card frequency
>
>
What jitter performance would actually be required by pro-audio ?

J.



> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
>
PrevNext  Index

1313577688.8362_0.ltw:2,a <CAPRPZsAxJi2km7TBWW0BfB=MkiYFYQu-DZnS+bb+6oy8Odu86A at mail dot gmail dot com>