Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments

Prev	Next Index
Date	Tue, 19 May 2009 18:56:39 +0200
From	Ralf Mardorf <[hidden] at alice-dsl dot net>
To	Bob Ham <[hidden] at bash dot sh>
Cc	Nedko Arnaudov <[hidden] at arnaudov dot name>, Linux Audio Developers <[hidden] at lists dot linuxaudio dot org>, JACK Developers <[hidden] at jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-To	Bob Ham Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments
Follow-Up	Patrick Shirkey Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments

Bob Ham wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 18:27 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>   
>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:49:58PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> I have to say, I think this is really out of line, Fons.  Implying free
>>> software developers are theives because they've changed something and
>>> you don't like it is quite extraordinary.
>>>       
>> I did not imply such a thing. You are completely 
>> missing the point.
>>     
>
> Such is the danger of analogies.  What was the point?
>   

Running gag: Metaphors don't work :D.

I wish you all get your views reconciled. Tonight I'll try to make music 
with Linux again (by using jack).

Good luck to you, good luck to myself,
Ralf

Prev	Next Index

1242752219.8372_0.ltw:2,a <4A12E4C7.3050104 at alice-dsl dot net>