Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments

PrevNext  Index
DateTue, 19 May 2009 17:44:36 +0100
From Bob Ham <[hidden] at bash dot sh>
ToFons Adriaensen <[hidden] at kokkinizita dot net>
CcNedko Arnaudov <[hidden] at arnaudov dot name>, Linux Audio Developers <[hidden] at lists dot linuxaudio dot org>, JACK Developers <[hidden] at jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToFons Adriaensen Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments
Follow-UpRalf Mardorf Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments
Follow-UpFons Adriaensen Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments 
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 18:27 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:49:58PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote:
> 
> > I have to say, I think this is really out of line, Fons.  Implying free
> > software developers are theives because they've changed something and
> > you don't like it is quite extraordinary.
> 
> I did not imply such a thing. You are completely 
> missing the point.

Such is the danger of analogies.  What was the point?


-- 
Bob Ham <[hidden]>
PrevNext  Index

1242751502.7833_0.ltw:2,a <1242751476.7364.31.camel at myrtle dot 6gnip dot net>