Re: [Jack-Devel] Network Audio Transmission - Quality

PrevNext  Index
DateMon, 24 Jun 2013 08:27:12 +0000
From John Rigg <[hidden] at jrigg dot co dot uk>
To[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-To[hidden] at trellis dot ch Re: [Jack-Devel] Network Audio Transmission - Quality
Follow-UpPaul Davis Re: [Jack-Devel] Network Audio Transmission - Quality
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 01:17:31AM +0200, [hidden] wrote:
> I agree it's important to check by listening and trust the ears! It can
> fool you though, just try to do the 'pepsi' test with a song as original
> wave and the same as 256kbit/s mp3. You probably won't hear the difference
> but it's there. :)

If I couldn't hear a difference between an original .wav file and a 256kb/s
mp3 I'd repair my monitoring equipment. In my experience mp3 encoding at
256kb/s can even change the perceived balance between elements in a mix,
sometimes requiring a remix if that is the main release format.

Back on topic, a simple null test is a good way of showing differences
between two audio files, particularly if your monitoring equipment has
insufficient resolution to reveal them when played normally. If there is
any difference over the network, something is broken.

John
PrevNext  Index

1372064418.13412_0.ltw:2,a <20130624082712.GA2417 at localhost dot localdomain>