Re: [Jack-Devel] [andraudio] Google I/O: High performance audio talk

PrevNext  Index
DateSat, 25 May 2013 10:53:31 +0000
From Dan MacDonald <[hidden] at gmail dot com>
ToFelix Homann <[hidden] at showlabor dot de>
CcJACK <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToDan MacDonald Re: [Jack-Devel] [andraudio] Google I/O: High performance audio talk
Follow-UpJ. Liles Re: [Jack-Devel] [andraudio] Google I/O: High performance audio talk
Ooops!

That should've been:

So why put yourself out fighting for JACK on a semi-free OS?

of course!


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Dan MacDonald <[hidden]> wrote:

> One final point I'd like to raise:
>
> Pat - you admit/ know that Android is not as free as Debian, Arch, Gentoo
> and other glibc based Linux OSs - right? So why put yourself out fighting
> for Android on a semi-free OS?
>
> JACK NOT being on Android is currently a plus for pulling people toward
> proper, openly developed operating systems. Whose side are you on?
>
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Felix Homann <[hidden]>wrote:
>
>> 2013/5/25 Patrick Shirkey <[hidden]>
>>
>>>
>>> In this case Audio Flinger is the default audio system on Android and we
>>> can't even run the
>>> other audio systems if we would like to.
>>>
>>> That is anti competitive behaviour.
>>
>>
>>
>> So essentially your saying that Google is abusing their market dominance
>> to keep competitors from entering the market of Android audio subsystems???
>>
>> 
>> Jack-Devel mailing list
>> [hidden]
>> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>>
>>
>
PrevNext  Index

1369479216.9289_0.ltw:2,a <CANOoOjvHKPHMBEU722-K2cMXfEmVVqhWmVjEb3a5GJ2t2r3jdg at mail dot gmail dot com>