Re: [Jack-Devel] Netjack error: “slave is running with a different protocol”

PrevNext  Index
DateSat, 25 May 2013 12:32:11 +0200
From Stéphane Letz <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
ToJörn Nettingsmeier <[hidden] at stackingdwarves dot net>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToJörn Nettingsmeier Re: [Jack-Devel] Netjack error: “slave is running with a different protocol”
Follow-Updavid64 Re: [Jack-Devel] Netjack error: “slave is running with a different protocol”
Le 25 mai 2013 à 12:25, Jörn Nettingsmeier <[hidden]> a écrit :

> On 05/24/2013 06:54 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>> On 05/21/2013 07:09 PM, Tom Williams wrote:
>> 
>>>> Error : slave is running with a different protocol tobago
>>>> Can't init new net master...
>>>> 
>>>> I checked the version of jackd on each system; one is 1.9.9 with
>>>> protocol 8, the other is 1.9.9.5 with protocol 8. So I'm doubtful
>>>> that's the issue.
>> 
>> Please update to the same version to eliminate this assumption.
>> 
>> It makes absolutely no sense to discuss the issue any further until you
>> run the same versions. If netjack is unhappy about versions, there's
>> nothing you can do about it.
>> 
>> If it's still unhappy when the versions do not differ, netjack is broken
>> and we have to fix it.
> 
> well, there is certainly something wrong with netjack there: no point in using and reporting a protocol version (which tom reports to be identical) if at the same time the jackd versions on both ends have to match exactly. so either ditch that protocol version message so as not to confuse users, or fix the compatibility issue so that all netjack instances claiming to support version 8 actually work together.

> plus the versions tom uses are more or less identical, they only differ in micro-release, which shouldn't break compatibility at all.
> 
> i wonder: is that jack protocol version just the internal one defined in jack.h? and is there a separate one for the netjack layer? this needs to be clarified.
> 
> 
> 
BTW : 8 is wrong ; netjack2 protocol version is currently 6, and (obviously..) different from server/client protocol.

Stéphane
PrevNext  Index

1369477941.7814_0.ltw:2, <30735E9C-4B12-4613-8285-42F05CD76C7F at grame dot fr>