Re: [Jack-Devel] [andraudio] Google I/O: High performance audio talk

On Thu, May 23, 2013 12:01 am, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> What rationale can they possibly have that makes it seem like a logical
> choice on their part?

Maybe that people who want to run low latency audio applications on their
phones are an incredibly small percentage of the total market.  And that
low latency applications have a detrimental impact on power consumption,
which decreases battery life, which is very important to a very large
percentage of the target market.

> Are they aware that they are getting close to a class action anti trust
> law suit

Ridiculous is the only polite term I can think of.  How can you have an
anti-trust lawsuit over an open source operating system?

If there was such a demand for low latency audio applications on Android
then certainly one of the OEM's could fork Android and provide a version
with low latency extensions enabled.

For that matter you could as well.  Get to work on it, I'm sure the
Cyanogen mod guys won't mind hosting.


-- 
Chris Caudle

1369343109.17835_0.ltw:2,a <be1863f04e5715c374d3baac2afca119.squirrel at email dot powweb dot com>