Re: [Jack-Devel] JD-Rack (JACK Done Right Audio Connection Kit)

I don't want to provide any more fuel for the bizarrely negative rants that
pydaw's author has already written about me.

For what its worth, many of you that I've interacted with on IRC know that
I myself think that many aspects of JACK, such as its existence, are
probably mistakes :) But the pydaw/jd-rack stuff? no comment.


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Dan MacDonald <[hidden]> wrote:

> I'm glad to have heard Stephane's opinion but worraboot Mr Davis? Maybe
> he's waiting to see some actual code but I'm sure he won't be impressed
> with the name of JD-RACK at least.
>
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Jeremy Jongepier <[hidden]>wrote:
>
>> On 05/02/2013 07:54 AM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 7:31 pm, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://pydaw.org/wp/2013/04/**29/pydaw-os-now-available-and-**
>>>> some-details-of-the-**tentatively-named-jd-rack/<http://pydaw.org/wp/2013/04/29/pydaw-os-now-available-and-some-details-of-the-tentatively-named-jd-rack/>
>>>>
>>>> Just FYI, I haven't used PyDAW myself and am in no way affiliated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It looks like this person has decided to do things a little differently
>>> but without supplying patches to the list.
>>>
>>> Just out of interest is there any reason that the so called improvements
>>> s/he has made are not possible to add as optional (maybe compile time
>>> optional) "features" to existing jack1/2/3?
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> Just check the PyDAW wiki. The developer of PyDAW apparently has a
>> heartfelt aversion to all current developments in Linux audio. JACK is
>> wrong, LV2 is wrong, NSM is wrong, etc. And not just the software itself
>> but also the people behind it.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>>  Seems like the main difference between jack1 and this fork is use of
>>> direct mmap by default.
>>>
>>> Not sure what their specific improvements to the session protocol are.
>>> Maybe they would like to share some more details?
>>>
>>> I have to disagree the session management has been holding anyone back
>>> though. That seems to be a little excessive. From the tone of the article
>>> I guess this person prefers to communicate over IRC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Patrick Shirkey
>>> Boost Hardware Ltd
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Jack-Devel mailing list
>>> [hidden]
>>> http://lists.jackaudio.org/**listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-**jackaudio.org<http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org>
>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Jack-Devel mailing list
>> [hidden]
>> http://lists.jackaudio.org/**listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-**jackaudio.org<http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org>
>>
>
>
> 
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> [hidden]
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>
>

1367496897.16125_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKngC17CRywwd-3r9H4yBQF1mGxB7vj3hUuS5uhL2KSKkQ at mail dot gmail dot com>