Re: [Jack-Devel] JD-Rack (JACK Done Right Audio Connection Kit)

PrevNext  Index
DateThu, 02 May 2013 15:54:06 +1000
From Patrick Shirkey <[hidden] at boosthardware dot com>
To[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToJeremy Jongepier [Jack-Devel] JD-Rack (JACK Done Right Audio Connection Kit)
Follow-UpStéphane Letz Re: [Jack-Devel] JD-Rack (JACK Done Right Audio Connection Kit)
Follow-UpJeremy Jongepier Re: [Jack-Devel] JD-Rack (JACK Done Right Audio Connection Kit)
On Wed, May 1, 2013 7:31 pm, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
> http://pydaw.org/wp/2013/04/29/pydaw-os-now-available-and-some-details-of-the-tentatively-named-jd-rack/
>
> Just FYI, I haven't used PyDAW myself and am in no way affiliated.
>

It looks like this person has decided to do things a little differently
but without supplying patches to the list.

Just out of interest is there any reason that the so called improvements
s/he has made are not possible to add as optional (maybe compile time
optional) "features" to existing jack1/2/3?

Seems like the main difference between jack1 and this fork is use of
direct mmap by default.

Not sure what their specific improvements to the session protocol are.
Maybe they would like to share some more details?

I have to disagree the session management has been holding anyone back
though. That seems to be a little excessive. From the tone of the article
I guess this person prefers to communicate over IRC.



--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
PrevNext  Index

1367474058.19877_0.ltw:2,a <50717.188.26.171.179.1367474046.squirrel at boosthardware dot com>