Re: [Jack-Devel] AMD Bulldozer CPUs, shared FPU and Intel Hyper-threading

PrevNext  Index
DateMon, 25 Mar 2013 19:39:29 -0700
From J. Liles <[hidden] at gmail dot com>
ToNedko Arnaudov <[hidden] at arnaudov dot name>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToNedko Arnaudov [Jack-Devel] AMD Bulldozer CPUs, shared FPU and Intel Hyper-threading
Follow-UpJ. Liles Re: [Jack-Devel] AMD Bulldozer CPUs, shared FPU and Intel Hyper-threading 
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Nedko Arnaudov <[hidden]> wrote:

> I'm concerned with how (if at all) AMD Bulldozer architecture [1] will
> affect the performance and reliability (xrun free) operation of the jack
> apps.
>
> I've made a test [2] that tries to emulate the situation but I have trouble
> finding people who own a machine with such CPU.
>
> I'm also interested if someone has similar problems because of the Intel
> Hyper-Threading Technology.
>
> [1]
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulldozer_%28processor%29#BULLDOZER_Core_.28aka_Module.29
> [2] https://github.com/nedko/dsptest
>
> --
> Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: 5D1B58ED>
>
> 
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> [hidden]
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>
>
Nedko, I ran this 5 times on Piledriver (FX-8350) and got the following
results:

Disturb influence -0.04%
Disturb influence  0.33%
Disturb influence  0.12%
Disturb influence -0.08%
Disturb influence  0.16%
PrevNext  Index

1364265582.22890_0.ltw:2,a <CAGhWSSZsBbdeaRsa7Q2PbT02USy1R2bkzWN9p2hLkmkpvbrhng at mail dot gmail dot com>