Re: [Jack-Devel] debian jack/pulse support [ was : Re: JACK in Chrome !! ]

PrevNext  Index
DateThu, 17 Jan 2013 16:57:49 -0500
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToKaj Ailomaa <[hidden] at mousike dot me>
CcJACK <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToPaul Davis Re: [Jack-Devel] debian jack/pulse support [ was : Re: JACK in Chrome !! ]
or even max-N syntax


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Paul Davis <[hidden]>wrote:

> someone should really hack PAM to accept N% syntax.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kaj Ailomaa <[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:48:05 +0100, Paul Davis <
>> [hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>  at this point in time, i personally can see absolutely no reason why a
>>> regular user should not have access to RT scheduling or memlock if the
>>> kernel and PAM (or equivalent) are normally and appropriately configured.
>>> give the user the ability to memlock 75% of the system RAM, make sure
>>> that
>>> the RT scheduling parameters reserve 5% of the CPU for non-RT tasks.
>>> done.
>>>
>>
>> I've been meaning to use a script to set memlock. Have a config in /etc
>> for setting the value in %, then let the script calculate the value from
>> available memory during boot.
>> I was unable to think of a better solution anyway.
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Jack-Devel mailing list
>> [hidden]
>> http://lists.jackaudio.org/**listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-**jackaudio.org<http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org>
>>
>
>
PrevNext  Index

1358459875.28958_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKmRZu3GKqyan0cR1R0M94a3vW0KG7GrEeEMniShdkq2yA at mail dot gmail dot com>