Re: [Jack-Devel] debian jack/pulse support [ was : Re: JACK in Chrome !! ]

PrevNext  Index
DateThu, 17 Jan 2013 06:57:23 -0500
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToDavid Henningsson <[hidden] at canonical dot com>
CcJACK <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToDavid Henningsson [Jack-Devel] debian jack/pulse support [ was : Re: JACK in Chrome !! ]
Follow-UpDavid Henningsson Re: [Jack-Devel] debian jack/pulse support [ was : Re: JACK in Chrome !! ]
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:32 AM, David Henningsson <
[hidden]> wrote:

> I haven't read all of this thread, but there are a few things I want to
> point out.
>
> 1) The audio group is not added on Ubuntu, because the "audio" group name
> is already used for another incompatible feature, i e, that of being able
> to exclusively access a sound card even though you are not logged in. See
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/**TheAudioGroup<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/TheAudioGroup>for details.
>

that document includes this line:

"This can be necessary for running low-latency audio without drop-outs, but
is bad from a security and stability point of view, as a process running
with real-time privileges can lock up the entire system completely. "

this is no longer true. it is trivial to configure the amount of time that
RT-scheduled tasks can consume. it can no longer be used as an explanation
of why RT scheduling is problematic.

5) IMO, what we Linux Audio developers need is a greater unification of
> what we want to accomplish and how, and more people with skill and time to
> make that happen. Complaining might help to some degree - at least it's
> better to complain than to just silently walk away in despair - but what we
> really need is more manpower, and skilled manpower.
>

amen. though we need bigger sticks, too.
PrevNext  Index

1358423851.6269_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cK=G6WNS4Z0G2YAT3WnMe847bneJW0ezrHohQFV=P++O9w at mail dot gmail dot com>