Re: [Jack-Devel] debian jack/pulse support [ was : Re: JACK in Chrome !! ]

PrevNext  Index
DateThu, 17 Jan 2013 09:03:06 +0900
From michael noble <[hidden] at gmail dot com>
ToAdrian Knoth <[hidden] at drcomp dot erfurt dot thur dot de>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToAdrian Knoth Re: [Jack-Devel] debian jack/pulse support [ was : Re: JACK in Chrome !! ]
just an FYI, but http://trac.jackaudio.org/ is currently inaccessible and
spewing a litany of python errors.


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Adrian Knoth <[hidden]>wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:22:38AM +1100, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>
> > >> The other thing that causes severe headaches is the naming of the
> > >> jack1/2 packages on Debian.
> > > I feel terribly sorry that we chose "jackd1" for jackd1 and "jackd2"
> for
> > > jackd2.
> > If you can't recieve constructive feedback that is not going to help
> > anything.
>
> Au contraire, I love constructive feedback. Where's your bug report?
>
>
> > I posted this thread to LAU in October last year.
>
> Since when is LAU the canonical bug tracker for Debian? I don't even
> read it.
>
>
> >
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2012-October/087822.html
>
> You don't need jackdbus for interacting with pulseaudio. But let me show
> you something:
>
> adi@foh:~$ apt-file search jackdbus
> jackd2: /usr/bin/jackdbus
> pulseaudio-module-jack:
> /usr/lib/pulse-2.0/modules/module-jackdbus-detect.so
>
>
> If you want to imply that it's impossible to figure out from this list
> that the packages "jackd2" and "pulseaudio-module-jack" might be useful,
> then I'm afraid I can't help.
>
> So we actually have three packages:
>
> jackd  --> dummy package that will pull in jackd2
> jackd1
> jackd2
>
> And guess what: the "I don't know what I'm doing, let's install jackd"
> attitude will just pull in jackd2, right the one you need.
>
> We cannot and probably never will pull in the pulseaudio module, since
> there are people who don't want pulseaudio on their systems. As simple
> as that.
>
> BTW: I just reread your LAU post:
>
> > When I looked yesterday I had jackd and jackd2. Today I have jackd and
> > jackdbus instead. No wonder people get confused
>
> The only confusion here is that "jackd" and "jackd2" are package names,
> while "jackd" and "jackdbus" are commands.
>
>
>
> > 1: start PA
> > 2: play something (not using jack)
> > 3: start jack
> > 4: verify that jack starts
> > 5: check that PA shows up as jack ports
> > 7: play something (not using jack)
> > 6: stop jack
> > 7: play something (not using jack)
>
>
> You're aware that I'm running pulseaudio on jackd for at least the last
> four years? That is, exactly the use case you describe. I have a custom
> pulseaudio configuration for this, and it's documented on
> trac.jackaudio.org.
>
> Are there other ways? Sure. "pasuspender -- jackd", that's what Ubuntu
> does.
>
>
> Anyway, since this is all about a PA bug that just got fixed upstream,
> there's little use in more talking. As soon as this fix hits the
> archives, the trouble will be gone. (Famous last words. ;) )
>
>
>
> --
> mail: [hidden]       http://adi.thur.de      PGP/GPG: key via keyserver
>
> 
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> [hidden]
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>



-- 
networking practice for sound environments :: http://nowhere.iamnobody.net
PrevNext  Index

1358380990.9199_0.ltw:2,a <CABf1g_yYuQM-JYX=TiFOX_Z3dwpdSq=4BLK1a+k2a=uSSEsYLQ at mail dot gmail dot com>