Re: [Jack-Devel] debian jack/pulse support [ was : Re: JACK in Chrome !! ]

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 16 Jan 2013 15:47:51 +0000
From Peter Nelson <[hidden] at fuzzle dot org>
ToPatrick Shirkey <[hidden] at boosthardware dot com>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToPatrick Shirkey [Jack-Devel] debian jack/pulse support [ was : Re: JACK in Chrome !! ]
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 02:22 +1100, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> On Thu, January 17, 2013 2:01 am, Adrian Knoth wrote:

> > I feel terribly sorry that we chose "jackd1" for jackd1 and "jackd2" for
> > jackd2.
> >
> >
> > We'll be more careful in the future.
> >
> 
> If you can't recieve constructive feedback that is not going to help
> anything.
> 
> I posted this thread to LAU in October last year.
> 
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2012-October/087813.html
> 
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2012-October/087822.html

Hmm, your complaint appears to be that jackdbus is packaged as jackd2?

As jackdbus is a compile time option of jackd2, not a separate version,
this seems perfectly correct to me.

> As it currently stands pulse audio does not play nicely with jack ootb on
> Debian Wheezy. You can dismiss it as not your problem but if the Debian
> packagers are not prepared to test this stuff before creating packages and
> feeding that back to the PA devs so they can fix the problem then all
> Debian users who want to use JACK with PA suffer as a result.

Check the pulseaudio-discuss for recent discussion about device
reservation. It is known not to work properly.

Peter
PrevNext  Index

1358351309.12051_0.ltw:2,a <1358351271.8239.6.camel at atropos dot lan dot fuzzle dot org>