Re: [Jack-Devel] JACK 1.9.10 to test (for 64/32 bits compatibility)
Adrian Knoth <[hidden]> writes:
> On 01/09/2013 05:09 PM, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
>>
>>>> But the problem with ABI mismatches between jack1 and jack2 is not
>>>> solved.
>>> Which one exactly? jack_latency_range_t?
>>>
>>> For jack_position_t, jackd1 does use packed structs:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/jackaudio/headers/blob/master/transport.h#L40
>>
>> jack2 does. This is why i'm talking about jack1/jack2 mismatches.
>
>> https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2/blob/master/common/jack/types.h#L262
>> https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2/blob/master/common/jack/types.h#L553
>
> Your first link is a semi-valid point, your second is not, because
> jackd1 also uses a packed jack_position_t.
Somehow it got messed in my head. Sorry for the noise.
--
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: 5D1B58ED>
1358030289.12508_0.ltw:2,S <87y5fyjada.fsf at arnaudov dot name>