Re: [Jack-Devel] Graph callback and client state
i was wrong about this. i will think (deeply) about it. jack1's behaviour
is probably (almost certainly) a bug.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Paul Davis <[hidden]>wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Pawel / Xj <[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have two simple questions mostly to Jack1 devs.
>>
>> 1) Do you agree that requiring "process" callback by "graph" callback is
>> bug ?
>> There is no problem with this in Jack2.
>> If yes, is this place is good for report this, or you need some more
>> official document ;-).
>>
>
> if it was true that it did this, i would consider it a bug. but i looked
> at the code and i don't see any such limitation. so i am puzzled.
>
1357671213.20672_0.ltw:2,Sa <CAFa_cKk6nriUzDkpW9CeKKHe4=teSQvhOR96TkBDu9R3Vd=mhg at mail dot gmail dot com>