Re: [Jack-Devel] JACK 1.9.10 to test (for 64/32 bits compatibility)

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:12 PM, John Emmas <[hidden]> wrote:

> Here's a thought....
>
> Is there any inherent reason why the alignment needs to be the same on
> different platforms?  Could it be 1-byte for Windows, JACK_ALIGN'd for ARM,
> 8-bytes for some other platform etc?
>

the goal is not identical packing.

its a single syntax to create the correct packing, whatever that is.

i still do not agree that mixed compiler installs of jackd+libjack should
be a target. it may be convenient, i get that. that isn't a justification
for this.

1357597603.8471_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cK=Bkrg7NnmeZe8HzX4gVeVAwNnBx2D7UnWFohesdAG3TQ at mail dot gmail dot com>