Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack 1.9.9 - proper way to build 'multilib' on 64bit? - since apparently the --mixed flag is now broken

PrevNext  Index
DateThu, 13 Dec 2012 21:44:25 +0100
From Stéphane Letz <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
Tojordan <[hidden] at gmail dot com>
CcJack-Devel <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-Tojordan [Jack-Devel] Jack 1.9.9 - proper way to build 'multilib' on 64bit? - since apparently the --mixed flag is now broken
Follow-UpAdrian Knoth Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack 1.9.9 - proper way to build 'multilib' on 64bit? - since apparently the --mixed flag is now broken
AFAICS --mixed was supposed to be kept.

Anyone knows better?

Thanks.

Stéphane 

Le 13 déc. 2012 à 21:36, jordan a écrit :

> Hi,
> 
> I was thinking it was about time to upgrade jackd / ffado and a few
> other bits, but i can't seem to get Jack 1.9.9 (multilib) to build on
> my system (Archlinux 64bit + multlib). Previously, i was always able
> to use the --mixed flag, which always worked just fine (and is also
> the way my distro builds/packages jack2-multilib). But now it seems to
> be broken.
> 
> here is a pastebin of the build failure; http://pastebin.com/VmfgqSQv
> 
> Note: building pure 64-bit works fine
> 
> I also tried to build 32bit jack separately, but didn't have much
> luck. ~ but i can usually build other 32bit apps no problem, but i am
> not sure what i need to do to make jack happy in this case.
> 
> Is there any chance that either A) Jackaudio.org will have proper
> instructions for building multilib jack, now that --mixed no longer
> works  or B) maybe fix --mixed, being as many people (and/or distro
> packagers) use that build option.
> 
> I'd also like to avoid having to setup a 32bit chroot, being as i am
> already using a multilib system - it's a big hassle to have to set one
> up _just_ for jack. (and obviously, i've never needed one before, so i
> shouldn't now).
> 
> Lastly, i did notice a discussion on this a month or so ago, but i was
> under the impression that the --mixed flag was going to be kept...but
> i may have missed part of the conversation. Anyways, any help, update
> on the situation would be appreciated. It's not critical that i update
> jack right now, but i thought since 1.9.9 is marked an actual release
> ~ it might be to my benefit to do so ;)
> 
> cheerz
> 
> Jordan
> 
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> [hidden]
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
PrevNext  Index

1355431481.11340_0.ltw:2,S <FA4DD45C-485B-4295-994F-769EBDD72CBC at grame dot fr>