Re: [Jack-Devel] [jack2] fails to build in mixed mode (#21)

Le 28 oct. 2012 à 14:25, Nedko Arnaudov a écrit :

> Stéphane Letz <[hidden]> writes:
> 
>> Le 28 oct. 2012 à 13:36, Adrian Knoth a écrit :
>> 
>>> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:21:15PM +0100, Stéphane Letz wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Though I don't see why anybody would want to build with --mixed, simply
>>>>> compiling on amd64 and i686 results in compatible libraries since March:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2012-03-09 Stephane Letz  <[hidden]>
>>>>> 
>>>>>      * Remove JACK_32_64 flag, so POST_PACKED_STRUCTURE now always used.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> We might want to drop the --mixed flag to inform users about this
>>>>> change.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Even if the server side should be now ready for mixed 64/32 bits, I
>>>> think the point is still to compile 32 bits and 64 bits version of
>>>> libjack yes?
>>> 
>>> What for? I take the source and compile it on i386 --> 32bit version of
>>> libjack. I take the source and compile it on amd64 --> 64bit version of
>>> libjack.
>>> 
>>> That's exactly how Ubuntu and Debian do it. jackd2 is multiarch now, so
>>> you can install 32bit and 64bit side by side. We've already dropped
>>> --mixed.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>> 
>> OK so then git patch/commit to removed it wecome.
> 
> What if some packagers still use --mixed? What if "jackd2 is multiarch
> now" doesnt apply to all distros? What is gained by dropping --mixed?
> 

OK.... you guys are much better than me as correctly deciding these Linux related issues...

Do what is best.

Stéphane 

1351431036.13498_0.ltw:2,a <9F66C7A9-6C78-4090-8477-BA4D35878FDC at grame dot fr>