Re: [Jack-Devel] [jack2] fails to build in mixed mode (#21)

PrevNext  Index
DateSun, 28 Oct 2012 13:58:50 +0100
From Stéphane Letz <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
ToAdrian Knoth <[hidden] at drcomp dot erfurt dot thur dot de>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToAdrian Knoth Re: [Jack-Devel] [jack2] fails to build in mixed mode (#21)
Follow-UpNedko Arnaudov Re: [Jack-Devel] [jack2] fails to build in mixed mode (#21)
Le 28 oct. 2012 à 13:36, Adrian Knoth a écrit :

> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:21:15PM +0100, Stéphane Letz wrote:
> 
>>> Though I don't see why anybody would want to build with --mixed, simply
>>> compiling on amd64 and i686 results in compatible libraries since March:
>>> 
>>> 2012-03-09 Stephane Letz  <[hidden]>
>>> 
>>>       * Remove JACK_32_64 flag, so POST_PACKED_STRUCTURE now always used.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We might want to drop the --mixed flag to inform users about this
>>> change.
>>> 
>> 
>> Even if the server side should be now ready for mixed 64/32 bits, I
>> think the point is still to compile 32 bits and 64 bits version of
>> libjack yes?
> 
> What for? I take the source and compile it on i386 --> 32bit version of
> libjack. I take the source and compile it on amd64 --> 64bit version of
> libjack.
> 
> That's exactly how Ubuntu and Debian do it. jackd2 is multiarch now, so
> you can install 32bit and 64bit side by side. We've already dropped
> --mixed.
> 
> 
> Cheers

OK so then git patch/commit to removed it wecome.

Stéphane
PrevNext  Index

1351429139.10546_0.ltw:2,a <C1E20371-7816-406B-A6E1-B30FFFEF635D at grame dot fr>