Re: [Jack-Devel] Windows application

PrevNext  Index
DateSun, 20 May 2012 11:00:44 +1000
From Geoff Beasley <[hidden] at laughingboyrecords dot com>
To"[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org" <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToJamie Heilman Re: [Jack-Devel] Windows application 
On 05/19/2012 05:09 PM, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> Geoff Beasley wrote:
>> >  My strong recommendation is to use Jack2 as it is more robust and
>> >  Netjack2 is far superior now to Netjack1 and Netone.
> Eh.  That's glossing over the rather important implementation
> difference that netjack2 is multicast, and netjack1 is unicast.  Which
> is more useful or easier to work with is highly dependant on your
> use-case.
good point Jamie, however I was talking about the stability and 
reliability of the codebase here

In any case on Windows he has only the Jack2 option.

g
PrevNext  Index

1337475514.18110_0.ltw:2,a <4FB8423C.9040905 at laughingboyrecords dot com>