Re: [Jack-Devel] jack_position_t documentation bug and question

PrevNext  Index
DateFri, 20 Apr 2012 10:34:08 -0700
From Devin Anderson <[hidden] at gmail dot com>
ToPaul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
CcJack devel <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToPaul Davis Re: [Jack-Devel] jack_position_t documentation bug and question
Follow-UpPaul Davis Re: [Jack-Devel] jack_position_t documentation bug and question 
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Paul Davis <[hidden]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Devin Anderson
> <[hidden]> wrote:
>> 1.) The documentation on the 'tick' member reads:
>>
>>    current tick-within-beat
>>
>>    Should be >0 and <=ticks_per_beat: the first tick is tick '0'.
>>
>> Either the first tick is actually '1', or the '>' should be '>=' and
>> the '<=' should be '<'.
>
> the > should be >= and the <= should be <

So, the first bar is 1, the first beat is 1, and the first tick is 0.
Why does the 'tick' member have a different starting index?

Thanks,

-- 
Devin Anderson
surfacepatterns (at) gmail (dot) com

blog - http://surfacepatterns.blogspot.com/
synthclone - http://synthclone.googlecode.com/
PrevNext  Index

1334943256.8484_0.ltw:2,a <CAG7zqTqeyUExCXiVx+44+VR2cyPwoqpK-79P170jZ-vR6aZ+9A at mail dot gmail dot com>