Re: [Jack-Devel] FFADO issues after freewheeling (was: Re: update jack from 1.9.7 to 1.9.8)

PrevNext  Index
DateThu, 08 Mar 2012 06:42:38 -0500
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToFons Adriaensen <[hidden] at linuxaudio dot org>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToFons Adriaensen Re: [Jack-Devel] FFADO issues after freewheeling (was: Re: update jack from 1.9.7 to 1.9.8)
this isn'tt true. during freewheeling, a physical backend is generally
going to be stopped and ignored until freewheeling stops. the device
can't be used, and since it is normally the device that drives the
entire cycle of processing, things looks fairly different when
freewheeling.

On 3/8/12, Fons Adriaensen <[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:14:43PM +1030, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
>
>> In any case, what this tends to prove is that the basic layers of FFADO
>> are
>> just fine with freewheeling.  The question simply comes down to whether
>> the
>> driver in use is able to successfully restart streaming.  If they can't
>> it's
>> definitely a bug which needs dealing with, but it's bug in the driver
>> rather
>> than the FFADO infrastructure.  Obviously I'll look into the Fireface
>> issue
>> since I now know about it; if freewheeling causes trouble with other
>> interfaces please let us know so they too can be investigated.
>
> Why should any part of FFADO be aware of freewheeling ?
> Basic I/O just continues, silence is output, input is
> discarded. The only difference is that the rest of the
> cycle becomes independent of this.
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
> Vor uns liegt ein weites Tal, die Sonne scheint - ein Glitzerstrahl.
>
> 
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> [hidden]
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>
PrevNext  Index

1331206966.17378_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKm53bEDGcASwHxjDB7SUWMvXeG1+=3Rpn5Af=UtDHpEsg at mail dot gmail dot com>