Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

PrevNext  Index
DateThu, 12 Jan 2012 08:07:48 +0530
From Joshua N Pritikin <[hidden] at pobox dot com>
ToPaul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToPaul Davis Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
Follow-UpMark Constable Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK 
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:46:57AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> What you're missing is that the reason for this idea is the
> recognition that the implementations of JACK (now and in the future)
> are independent projects.

I encourage you to explore GIT submodules. I used submodules about a 
year ago. There are some gotchas, but the learning curve is not much 
steeper than GIT itself. Submodules certainly seem very appropriate for 
the problem you are trying to solve. Furthermore, I have heard rumors 
that GIT submodule support is improving.

-- 
Joshua N. Pritikin
Department of Psychology
University of Virginia
Gilmer Hall 102; Charlottesville, VA 22903
http://people.virginia.edu/~jnp3bc
PrevNext  Index

1326335890.2503_0.ltw:2,a <20120112023748.GD7665 at ubuntu>