Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 11 Jan 2012 14:35:08 -0500
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToMark Constable <[hidden] at renta dot net>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToMark Constable Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
Follow-UpMark Constable Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
Follow-UpAdrian Knoth Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Mark Constable <[hidden]> wrote:
> On 12/01/12 04:37, Paul Davis wrote:
>>
>> my understanding is that using github makes absolutely no difference
>> to this whatsoever. if it did, there wouldn't be a lot of point to
>> git, would there?
>
>
> It's just easier and faster to use, one click remote clones and pull
> requests.

one click? i'm confused. i'm a developer, working on my machine using
various git(1) tools. what does "1 click" have to do with anything?

from what i read about things like gitolite, its not very hard to set
up a flexible, useful git server anywhere one wants it to be.

> up READMEs are a delight. Yes I know that the structure of whatever
> repo is used is the hard part, but after that hurdle, using Github
> would help coordinate and accelerate future development.

you think that issues with SCM have been holding back jack development?
PrevNext  Index

1326310522.28583_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cK=EhgikwqdYK9GtkUzncskaLn+z1u=aEehFZiJUGCX3uA at mail dot gmail dot com>