Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

Prev	Next Index
Date	Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:58:32 +0100
From	Adrian Knoth <[hidden] at drcomp dot erfurt dot thur dot de>
To	[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-To	Fons Adriaensen Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 01:44:52PM +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

> I'd completely split off the example clients and tools: if these are apps
> they should be compiled *as applications*, that is using the installed
> headers instead of those from the repo, and have their own manpages.

Good idea. So jack_lsp, jack_rec and the lot would no longer be shipped
by any of the jackd packages, but live completely on their own.

I assume it's not too hard for the Windows guys to bundle or
automatically download the "tools package".

> Also manpages for the server could be different for jack1 and jack2 so
> these probably belong with their own version and not in common.

Absolutely. Though we've tried to make the invocation interface as
similar as possible in the past. Which is a good thing I'd say.

Cheers

-- 
mail: [hidden]  	http://adi.thur.de	PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

Prev	Next Index

1326290329.31071_0.ltw:2,a <20120111135832.GB4633 at ltw dot loris dot tv>