Re: [Jack-Devel] ladish + jack autoconnect

PrevNext  Index
DateSat, 31 Dec 2011 18:57:31 +0100
From Robin Gareus <[hidden] at gareus dot org>
ToNedko Arnaudov <[hidden] at arnaudov dot name>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToNedko Arnaudov Re: [Jack-Devel] ladish + jack autoconnect
Follow-UpFons Adriaensen Re: [Jack-Devel] ladish + jack autoconnect
On 12/31/2011 06:08 PM, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
> Paul Davis <[hidden]> writes:
> 
>> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Nedko Arnaudov <[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Do I get it right that you will accept patch that adds both startup
>>> option and makes it controlable in a running server?
>>
>> assuming it looks generally clean and nobody else raises some
>> fundamental objection to the idea, sure.
> 
> Ok so here's a plan waiting for aproval:

>  1. wait until nobody else raises some fundamental objection
>  2. Paul Davis declares that wait is complete

I suggest you directly jump to step 3: The idea has been out for a week
on jack-devel. Meanwhile many core-team members have shown on other
threads that they're not on offline holiday.. nobody objected.

>  3. Nedko Arnaudov makes a detailed proposal with implementation details
>  4. Paul Davis approves it or crtiticizes it with goto step 3

Stephane, Fons et al may provide some [constructive] criticism once the
detailed proposal is out.

>  5. Nedko Arnaudov implements the approved detailed proposal and sends
>     it to mailing list for review.
>  6. Paul Davis verifies that its generally clean and matches the
>     detailed proposal from step 3. If it is not generally clean or the
>     patch does not match the proposal from step 3, goto step 5.
>  7. Paul Davis commits it to jack1

That might be held back by Paul's work to unify the headers of jack; not
sure if your patch effects that.

>  8. Stephane Letz declares that he will accept equivalent improvement in
>     jack2.
>  9. Nedko Arnaudov modifies the existing patch to include make the
>     option controllable in a running server.
>  10. Stephane Letz reviews the no-self-connect git branch and eventually
>     merges it into jack2 trunk (and will be part of next jack2 release).
>     If its not ok, goto step 9.
> 
> I'll go with steps 1 to 7 if Paul Davis publicly agrees with them.
> I'll go with steps 8 to 10 if Stephane Letz agrees with them.

keep up the good work,
robin
PrevNext  Index

1325354285.7166_0.ltw:2,a <4EFF4D0B.8090507 at gareus dot org>