Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

User here (albeit with a technical background).
I am still learning JACK and Linux-based audio, but I can think of a few cases where it seems cross-platform Jack would be helpful, especially if I start orchestrating something large and get two computers involved.  The net applications also seem to have obvious benefits.



-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Goode <[hidden]>
To: Paul Davis <[hidden]>
Cc: jack-devel <[hidden]>
Sent: Wed, Dec 14, 2011 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK


>> the same question (in a different form): given the small developer
> base (identified as one reason for Jack's current problematic state),
> is there any good reason (from a Linux user's POV) to waste any time
> on a Windows version (which only complicates things) ?

As a Jack user on Linux, OS-X and Windows, I want to thank the Jack2
evelopers for their cross-platform support. My main audio usage is
irtual pipe organ applications - and being able to build Fluidsynth
or Windows with Jack for Windows native support is a major
reakthrough for jOrgan users on the Windows platform... There will
ikely be native Jack for Windows support in a couple of other Windows
udio apps in the next six months.
Waste of time? No way. Jack's user base is growing on the Windows platform...
GrahamG
ohannesburg, South Africa
______________________________________________
ack-Devel mailing list
[hidden]
ttp://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org

1323968287.20575_0.ltw:2,a <8CE8961C8455B2E-1070-85BAF at webmail-d078 dot sysops dot aol dot com>