Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 14 Dec 2011 20:24:47 -0600
From David Nielson <[hidden] at comcast dot net>
To[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToFons Adriaensen Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
Follow-UpGeoff Beasley Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
Follow-UpDavid Nielson Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK - on second thought
  On 12/14/2011 03:35 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> 2. A completely separate matter - I'd like to ask and invite
> anyone to respond: is there any serious Linux Audio *USER*
> out there who cares about Jack on Windows ? I certainly do not.
> All I want is the best possible tools on Linux (and let OSX be
> a corner case). Note that I'm asking *USERS*. For a developer
> there may be some gratification in knowing that his/her work is
> invading the proprietary world. He/she may even believe that
> this will lure Windows users into switching to Linux. I don't
> think that it would: the better it works on Windows the less
> reason anyone has to change.
When I need to use Windows audio software, I connect machines using MIDI 
and SPDIF, or in extreme cases, ADAT. Using a network-based transport on 
Windows, for my particular workflow, is superfluous.

Since the only thing I use Windows for anymore is Team Fortress 2, 
Cubase, and a few things that will never get ported, there is really no 
reason for me ever to use Jack on Windows.

David Nielson
PrevNext  Index

1323915908.5105_0.ltw:2,a <4EE95A6F.9010109 at comcast dot net>