Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 14 Dec 2011 17:19:56 -0500
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToFons Adriaensen <[hidden] at linuxaudio dot org>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToFons Adriaensen Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
Follow-UpGraham Goode Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
Follow-UpFons Adriaensen Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Fons Adriaensen <[hidden]> wrote:

> AFAIK there is no Ardour on Windows.

Ardour 2 and 3 both run on Windows. There has been no release of
Ardour for Windows.

> the same question (in a different form): given the small developer
> base (identified as one reason for Jack's current problematic state),
> is there any good reason (from a Linux user's POV) to waste any time
> on a Windows version (which only complicates things) ?

This is one of the main reasons why there has been no release.

JACK is not "an app". Its plumbing. It is already cross-platform. It
is already released for 5 major OS platforms (Linux, OS X, Windows,
BSD, Solaris). The situation is very different from the question of
whether or not app Foobar should be released on Windows when it
currently does not exist for that platform.

--p
PrevNext  Index

1323901207.26130_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKm+=mh_wEP9TK0PmEa9seZi_+Fcx5DUTPCcY3XmObUZqg at mail dot gmail dot com>