Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 14 Dec 2011 09:23:33 -0500
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToStéphane Letz <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToStéphane Letz Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
Follow-UpStéphane Letz Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK 
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Stéphane Letz <[hidden]> wrote:
> OK, assuming the answer to "do we gain something by doing a new implementation" is yes, the next question is : who is going todo that? who is going to do multi-OS support? who is going to port current specific code (backend, bridges?) to this now code base? who is going to debug/test it?

Without a clear indication that JACK development would end up
following a single path, I suspect nobody. I think you've made it
fairly clear that you have no intention of switching to any new
implementation and intend to continue working on Jack2.
PrevNext  Index

1323872631.17408_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKkmC1guHuCVxnbXRbEg-XKx8bGb-PZUVLNTJJ4FJQaUMQ at mail dot gmail dot com>