Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

PrevNext  Index
DateTue, 13 Dec 2011 12:48:44 -0500
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToStéphane Letz <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
CcJACK <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToStéphane Letz Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK 
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Stéphane Letz <[hidden]> wrote:

> So basically Paul you still don't want to choose...

I'm trying to establish whether a choice between 2 or 3 alternatives
is necessary.

> Grame position is quite clear: we are committed to work on JACK2 codebase, which basically implement a superset of JACK1 features (http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2). If critical lacks in JACK2 (present in JACK1) are identified and are considered mandatory, please list them first. We consider that this basic choice has to be done first.

That pretty much clarifies your position.
PrevNext  Index

1323798712.6919_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKnKG_TRyThQCrF7VKuMT-XunDjAr38F0NVu_2zTTP8azA at mail dot gmail dot com>