Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

PrevNext  Index
DateFri, 09 Dec 2011 15:29:44 -0500
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToGeoff Beasley <[hidden] at laughingboyrecords dot com>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToGeoff Beasley Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Geoff Beasley
<[hidden]> wrote:
>> * the JACK 1.0 API must be defined first
>
> hhmm, can i suggest that you consider a name change ?  i'm thinking jack 1.0
>  isn't going to sufficiently define  the new jack and could very well cause
> even more confusion.

this is for an API.

Confusion over what an API is and what an implementation is are one of
the central issues at present.

the point is that there's very little in moving on with anything
drastic until we can at least agree that the JACK API has reached 1.0
by now.

--p
PrevNext  Index

1323462597.11553_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKmKxH4_Dk1=WCCmeKFjMYPNEcpJOZWZTVm6rBSrK3i-hA at mail dot gmail dot com>