Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Fred Gleason <[hidden]> wrote:
> Project?
Check.
> Specification?
Check, but only in the form of header files (API) and associated documentation.
> Protocol (network or otherwise)?
More than one.
Control protocol: public, defined by an API
Server/Library protocol: private, not defined, not accessible.
Network streaming: at least three. Currently none are considered
to be "part of JACK", but rather just protocols used by jack clients.
> Codebase?
Check, but more than one.
> API?
Check.
> ABI?
Check, but insufficiently defined.
> Library?
Check, but this sort of an implementation detail.
> Community?
Not sure that this matters.
> Something else?
Server: check.
1323446184.14630_0.ltw:2,Sa <CAFa_cKnm7xrcQdAxzX_YNe0u0JmsOVLz8B4MnSBgivUULoR8Ag at mail dot gmail dot com>