Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK

PrevNext  Index
DateThu, 08 Dec 2011 18:55:36 +0100
From Stéphane Letz <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
ToPaul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
CcJACK <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToPaul Davis [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
Follow-UpPaul Davis Re: [Jack-Devel] The Situation(s) With JACK
> 
>                                    It Has To Stop.
> 
> I do have a proposal for how this is going to stop, but before I put
> it forward, I would like to first see if there are any other ideas
> floating around on the mailing list that have not come up when I've
> discussed this situation on IRC. Once any discussion about this email
> settles down, I'll outline my proposal (whatever it ends up being at
> that point).
> 
> This is a decision that affects users, packagers, distributions,
> developers and other people. Despite a radically innovative (and,
> thanks to Stephane, cross-platform) design and unmatched
> functionality, the project needs a change in direction in order to
> live up to its potential. If it can live up to it, then JACK will be
> the simple, natural, functional choice for audio and MIDI on all 3
> major OS platforms including network streaming, and the confusion and
> stagnated development that it embodies now will be a thing of the
> past. If it can't, JACK will continue to be a useful tool, but will
> likely slowly rot. Lets try to avoid that if we can.

I suggest that you just post your proposal.

Stéphane
PrevNext  Index

1323366944.26930_0.ltw:2,a <FADB7616-8682-4AEF-8455-18FB0BCE419B at grame dot fr>