Re: [Jack-Devel] netjack1 / netjack2

PrevNext  Index
DateMon, 03 Oct 2011 18:24:07 -0400
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToTobias Hoffmann <[hidden] at thax dot hardliners dot org>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToTobias Hoffmann [Jack-Devel] netjack1 / netjack2 
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Tobias Hoffmann
<[hidden]> wrote:

> 1. It is my understanding, that netjack (as slave) is one of simplest
> audio-over-ip protocols (others being dante, ravenna, etc,...), especially
> for fpga implementations, is this correct? (or would it be better to start
> with something else?)

depends on what you want to do.

> 2. Is there any concise ("RFC-like") documentation of the netjack1 and/or
> netjack2 protocol (i.e. control packets, data packets)?

no.

> 3. "Is netjack1 or netjack2 the way to go?"
>  (Beyond knowing that netjack2 has discovery and advanced fragmentation
> support?)

hopefully you read: http://jackaudio.org/netjack

netjack1 has somewhat more active developer support & maintainance. a
few months ago, i would have said "dramatically more".

--p
PrevNext  Index

1317680667.24530_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKnyX9dnLERWJ156G13voeVBMRsnT+DapfftY0X2i_2uvg at mail dot gmail dot com>