Re: [Jack-Devel] VideoJACK

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Harry van Haaren <[hidden]> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I wasn't aware that patches existed to route video around JACK... although
> the idea has been on list a couple of times before IIRC.
> I'm aware the patches are pretty outdated at this stage, but if work was to
> be done in this area would mainline JACK versions be open
> to taking it into upstream?

this has been asked before, yes. the core developers of JACK (that
includes me) were not happy with the specific way that the guys who
did videojack went about it. we think that the general idea of video
for jack is excellent. but the implementation would need to change in
fairly fundamental ways for it be merged into any mainline version of
JACK. i don't currently recall what the fundamental problems where.

1313934690.30620_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKnnJJ_b5g=5MCtbPtEMyyPKVa7+fhgxFyA5GftEWNqD0Q at mail dot gmail dot com>