Re: [Jack-Devel] Netjack Master Standalone

Paul, thanks for the link, I missed it when I was looking at the WEB site.
I assumed wrongfully that Netjack2 was a replacement for Netjack1.
I need low latency so jack.trip does not seems to be a good choice for me.
I have high bandwidth (Gigabit ethernet), I don't want data compression and
my client and server both have fixed IP address so I don't need discovery.
Knowing this, is there a reason to choose Netjack2 over Netjack1 or vice
versa?


On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Paul Davis <[hidden]>wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:36 PM, leeloo <[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > I read the netjack documentation on the WEB site and started to implement
> it
> > by looking at the Jack source code and also looking at the packets with
> > Wireshark.
> > I am making progress but only slowly and was wondering if there was
> better
> > way to do this?
> > Also I am converting the C++ code to C because the C++ compiler does not
> > work on my embedded system.
>
> I'm not sure you've read this page yet:
>
>   http://jackaudio.org/netjack
>
> because otherwise you would have clarified which version of netjack
> you are talking about.
>

1303356745.7272_0.ltw:2,a <BANLkTim8uD+RKw6RBSXK9+wvYA0jzsKTJA at mail dot gmail dot com>