Re: [Jack-Devel] issues with latency management with "complex" clients
On Wednesday 16 February 2011 16:21:21 Arne Jacobs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In the example you provided, for each track, couldn't you, just define
> one output port for playback mode and one for recording mode, and then
> change connections depending on mode? Or would that be too expensive?
> Latency computation would theoretically only have to be done once for
> each of the two ports, wouldn't it?
No, latency is recalculated on each graph-change. Changing connections is a
graph-change. So this would only hold the penalty of one additional port per
ardour-mono-channel.
Have fun,
Arnold
1297871087.29144_0.ltw:2,a <201102161644.25607.arnold at arnoldarts dot de>