Re: [Jack-Devel] memlock unlimited
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:10 PM, ailo <[hidden]> wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 06:53 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:51 PM, ailo <[hidden]> wrote:
>>> I know this issue has been discussed before.
>>> Is there any real danger in having this in
>>> /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf?:
>>>
>>> @audio - memlock unlimited
>>
>> not really. the warning will be removed from future versions.
>
> Is there any situation where it would be better to use less then
> unlimited memlock?
the only risk is that a rogue app could potentially ask to lock all
memory and this would probably cause a system lockup. but there are
other protections in place against this, and its really a rather
unlikely thing to have happen.
1297448277.16063_0.ltw:2,a <AANLkTim_ozH2RWvinEONgD5NEvz+qS6u=v=koSTbx0sM at mail dot gmail dot com>