Re: [LAD] New proposal for the jackd/jackdbus mess

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 20 May 2009 11:20:30 +0100
From Krzysztof Foltman <[hidden] at foltman dot com>
ToStéphane Letz <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
CcJack devel <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>, Linux Audio Developers <[hidden] at lists dot linuxaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToStéphane Letz [LAD] New proposal for the jackd/jackdbus mess
Follow-UpStéphane Letz Re: [LAD] New proposal for the jackd/jackdbus mess
Follow-UpFernando Lopez-Lezcano Re: [LAD] New proposal for the jackd/jackdbus mess 
Stéphane Letz wrote:

> This scheme seems to hopefully solve most of the problems we had, and
> requires only a bit of change for the "jackdbus" front-end to continue
> working, but not much.

One obvious problem is that it will be necessary to create yet another
IPC protocol for control communication between libjack.so and
libjackserver.so. Why not use something already proven and with existing
tools like call monitor, command line interface etc. - that's why D-Bus
was used in first place.

Don't we already have too much NIH?

Oh well, maybe not ;)

Krzysztof
PrevNext  Index

1242814845.10615_0.ltw:2,a <4A13D96E.5080005 at foltman dot com>