Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments

PrevNext  Index
DateTue, 19 May 2009 22:32:03 +0200
From Ralf Mardorf <[hidden] at alice-dsl dot net>
ToPatrick Shirkey <[hidden] at boosthardware dot com>
CcLinux Audio Developers <[hidden] at lists dot linuxaudio dot org>, JACK Developers <[hidden] at jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToPatrick Shirkey Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments
You get me wrong.

Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> Ralf.
>
> I find it hard to see how you actually understand Linux audio. I get 
> the impression that you have almost tried but instead have 
> persistently trolled on this point since you arrived.
>
> The above is a "full stop" of Ralfs dialog, I say this just in case 
> there is a possible alternative that seems to make sense for a 
> temporary period.
>
> Ralf.
>
> Please stop with your destabilising crap.
>
> - For reference : This must be the 50th time Ralf has been asked to 
> stop dissing Linux Audio...
>
> Eventually someone from the mass media will see through his bs (and M$ 
> fud). Until that time we are at his merciful prerogative to make Linux 
> audio look like he and his cronies give a shit.  I have to wonder tho, 
> That if he is prepared to  spend this much time dissing Linux audio, 
> then his boosses must be really scared about the results as they are 
> obviously well aware of how close we are to the existing sytem that 
> has been devised by  the "Geniuses" at ...(insert your favorite sound 
> system here)
> Ralf. I would really love to hear a conclusive rebuttal from you.. 
> After four years. (is it really that long?)  I  think we are owed a 
> conclusive response.
>
>
> Patrick Shirkey
> Boost Hardware Ltd
>
>
>
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Bob Ham wrote:
>>  
>>> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 18:27 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>>>      
>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:49:58PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> I have to say, I think this is really out of line, Fons.  Implying 
>>>>> free
>>>>> software developers are theives because they've changed something and
>>>>> you don't like it is quite extraordinary.
>>>>>               
>>>> I did not imply such a thing. You are completely missing the point.
>>>>           
>>> Such is the danger of analogies.  What was the point?
>>>       
>>
>> Running gag: Metaphors don't work :D.
>>
>> I wish you all get your views reconciled. Tonight I'll try to make 
>> music with Linux again (by using jack).
>>
>> Good luck to you, good luck to myself,
>> Ralf
>> 
>> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
>> [hidden]
>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>>   
>

-- 
PrevNext  Index

1242765153.20627_0.ltw:2,a <4A131743.1040003 at alice-dsl dot net>